Top

Mark S. Bonchek
Chief Strategist

About My Company

Soundbridge is a global business media company.

Marketing to Executives
   Truman Company

Learning from Executives
   Fifty Lessons (Video)
   Insight Learning (China)

How to Reach Me

ON


This form does not yet contain any fields.

    Entries in conversation enablement (2)

    Tuesday
    Feb032009

    Conversation Enablement

    Commenting on my earlier post "Can We Talk", Paul agreed that "conversation enablement is the way to go" and asked some great questions.  They were so good that I'm going to use them as the structure for this post.  Hopefully they will spark further comments ... and perhaps a conversation.

    "Who is a thought leader in that space?"

    I actually haven't seen many thought leaders on real conversation enablement in sales situations.  There are a number of thought leaders on conversational marketing, but they don't really address what happens one-on-one with a buyer, nor how to enable conversations that a buyer has internally with stakeholders.  Some of the sales training companies like The Complex Sale or Executive Conversation cover the conversational dimension of selling, but they tend to focus on sales skills, not what needs to happen to enable the conversation.  Joe Pulizzi and New Barrett's work on content marketing is relevant, since you need good content to spark a good conversation.  John Aiello at SAVO is also good on the platforms that are required to deliver the content.

    "Where can I find an approach for conversation enablement that works?"

    Unfortunately, I don't think there is a systematic approach yet for conversation enablement.  Or at least I haven't found one.  I think one of our companies, Truman Company, knows as much about it as anyone, but it isn't yet systematized.  Perhaps we should start a stub on Wikipedia?

    "Are we talking wikinomics and opening up of enterprise social networks to our customers to get the voice of the customer in our organization?"

    I think this could be considered in a broader definition of conversation enablement.  In some sense, even the scripts used in call centers could be considered conversation enablement -- whatever helps employees hold productive conversations with customers and buyers.

    "Or are we talking about our internal sales enablement application having more web2.0 components and providing the sales force with more food for thought for better conversations?"

    This is where my interest has been:  in B2B settings, enabling better conversations among sales people about how to sell, enabling conversation among customers, and enabling better conversations by sales people with customers.

    "Should the conversation with the customer happen online more often and face to face less often to leverage the collective conversation skills of more of my employees?"

    It depends on the level of the customer in their organization.  As you move up into the managerial and executive ranks, you need to have a much greater focus on face-to-face.

    "Or are we looking for more dynamic client presentations that can be generated customized by audience, industry vertical, type of meeting, country, etc...?"

    This is necessary but not sufficient.  And it leads to my main point.  A conversation is not a presentation, no matter how customized it might be.  A presentation can help to provide context and be a catalyst for a conversation.  But it is not a conversation.  In a presentation, you know where you are going.  In a conversation, you don't.  Presentations are about delivery.  Conversations are about discovery.

    We are having a conversation about conversation enablement because I don't know the answers.  If I did, I could just give a presentation.  But for now, we'll need to discover the answer together in the context of a conversation.

    Tuesday
    Jan272009

    Can We Talk?

    IDC just announced some interesting research on sales enablement.

    The research, presented by Lee Levitt in a telebriefing today, showed that B2B sellers are not doing a very good job aligning with buyers' needs.

    80% of companies are trying to "improve the quality of face time with buyers" but only 16% are doing a good job at "solution selling."

    What can companies and salespeople do to improve?

    The #1 answer from buyers:  "Put aside the generic pitch." This beat the #2 response by more than two to one. 

    We have seen this over and over again in our work:  The level of engagement with an executive buyer is a direct result of the quality of the conversation.  Not the quality of the presentation ---  but the quality of the conversation.

    Lee had some great things to say about improving sales enablement. 

    But one thing was missing.  All of the focus was on information management -- the systems and processes to manage sales-related information. 

    Sales organizations need to think not only about sales enablement, but conversation enablement.

    Buyers make up their mind within the first few minutes about a salesperson and what they are offering.  I believe that for an executive, this is as much about the information the salesperson is presenting (the value proposition), as the way in which they present it (presentational or conversational).

    The executive is thinking:  Is this someone who can listen, who will reflect on what I have to say, who will share relevant experiences, make useful connections, and offer insight beyond the product they are selling. 

    If companies are serious about  improving the quality of face-time with executive buyers, they will work on these questions too.